RUB » Bibliotheksportal

Lukka Popp, Sabrina Fuths, Sabine Seehagen, Margarete Bolten, Mirja Gross‑Hemmi, Dieter Wolke, Silvia Schneider

• \(\textbf {Background:}\) Regulatory problems such as excessive crying, sleeping–and feeding difficulties in infancy are some of the earliest precursors of later mental health difficulties emerging throughout the lifespan. In the present study, the inter rater reliability and acceptance of a structured computer assisted diagnostic interview for regulatory problems (Baby DIPS) was investigated. \(\textbf {Methods:}\) Using a community sample, 132 mothers of infants aged between 3 and 18 months (mean age = 10 months) were interviewed with the Baby DIPS regarding current and former (combined = lifetime) regulatory problems. Severity of the symptoms was also rated. The interviews were conducted face to face at a psychology department at the university (51.5 %), the mother’s home (23.5 %), or via telephone (25.0 %). Inter rater reliability was assessed with Cohen’s kappa \(\textit {(k)}\). A sample of 48 mothers and their interviewers filled in acceptance questionnaires after the interview. \(\textbf {Results:}\) Good to excellent inter rater reliability on the levels of current and lifetime regulatory problems (\(\it k\) = 0.77–0.98) were found. High inter rater agreement was also found for ratings of severity (\(\it ICC\) = 0.86–0.97). Participants and interviewers’ overall acceptance ratings of the computer assisted interview were favourable. Acceptance scores did not differ between interviews that revealed one or more clinically relevant regulatory problem(s) compared to those that revealed no regulatory problems. \(\textbf {Conclusions:}\) The Baby DIPS was found to be a reliable instrument for the assessment of current and lifetime problems in crying and sleeping behaviours. The computer assisted version of the Baby DIPS was well accepted by interviewers and mothers. The Baby DIPS appears to be well suited for research and clinical use to identify infant regulatory problems.