Moxifloxacin monotherapy versus combination therapy in patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia evoked ARDS

  • \(\textbf {Background:}\) We tested the hypothesis that moxifloxacin monotherapy is equally effective and safe as a betalactam antibiotic based combination therapy in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) evoked by severe community acquired pneumonia (CAP). \(\textbf {Methods:}\) In a retrospective chart review study of 229 patients with adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) admitted to our intensive care unit between 2001 and 2011, 169 well-characterized patients were identified to suffer from severe CAP. Patients were treated with moxifloxacin alone, moxifloxacin in combination with \(\beta\)-lactam antibiotics, or with another antibiotic regimen based on \(\beta\)-lactam antibiotics, at the discretion of the admitting attending physician. The primary endpoint was 30-day survival. To assess potential drug-induced liver injury, we also analyzed biomarkers of liver cell integrity. \(\textbf {Results:}\) 30-day survival (69% overall) did not differ (\(\it p\) = 0.89) between moxifloxacin monotherapy (\(\it n\) = 42), moxifloxacin combination therapy (\(\it n\) = 44), and other antibiotic treatments (\(\it n\) = 83). We found significantly greater maximum activity of aspartate transaminase (\(\it p\) = 0.048), alanine aminotransferase (\(\it p\) = 0.003), and direct bilirubin concentration (\(\it p\) = 0.01) in the moxifloxacin treated groups over the first 10–20 days. However, these in-between group differences faded over time, and no differences remained during the last 10 days of observation. \(\textbf {Conclusions:}\) In CAP evoked ARDS, moxifloxacin monotherapy and moxifloxacin combination therapy was not different to a betalactam based antibiotic regimen with respect to 30-day mortality, and temporarily increased markers of liver cell integrity had no apparent clinical impact. Thus, in contrast to the current S3 guidelines, moxifloxacin may also be safe and effective even in patients with severe CAP evoked ARDS while providing coverage of an extended spectrum of severe CAP evoking bacteria. However, further prospective studies are needed for definite recommendations.

Download full text files

Export metadata

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar
Metadaten
Author:Tim RahmelORCiDGND, Sven AsmussenGND, Jan KarlikGND, Jörg Helmut SteinmannGND, Michael AdamzikORCiDGND, Jürgen PetersGND
URN:urn:nbn:de:hbz:294-59257
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-017-0376-5
Parent Title (English):BMC anesthesiology
Document Type:Article
Language:English
Date of Publication (online):2018/07/12
Date of first Publication:2017/06/14
Publishing Institution:Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Universitätsbibliothek
Tag:Open Access Fonds
30-day mortality; Acute respiratory distress syndrome; CAP; Consensus guideline; Liver failure; S3 guideline
Volume:17
First Page:78-1
Last Page:78-9
Note:
Article Processing Charge funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) and the Open Access Publication Fund of Ruhr-Universität Bochum.
Institutes/Facilities:Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin und Schmerztherapie
Dewey Decimal Classification:Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften / Medizin, Gesundheit
open_access (DINI-Set):open_access
faculties:Medizinische Fakultät
Licence (English):License LogoCreative Commons - CC BY 4.0 - Attribution 4.0 International