Long-term mortality and outcome in hospital survivors of septic shock, sepsis, and severe infections

  • Patients with severe infections and especially sepsis have a high in-hospital mortality, but even hospital survivors face long-term sequelae, decreased health-related quality of life, and high risk of death, suggesting a great need for specialized aftercare. However, data regarding a potential benefit of post-discharge rehabilitation in these patients are scarce. In this retrospective matched cohort study the claim data of a large German statutory health care insurer was analyzed. 83,974 hospital survivors having suffered from septic shock, sepsis, and severe infections within the years 2009–2016 were identified using an ICD abstraction strategy closely matched to the current Sepsis-3 definition. Cases were analyzed and compared with their matched pairs to determine their 5-year mortality and the impact of post-discharge rehabilitation. Five years after hospital discharge, mortality of initial hospital survivors were still increased after septic shock (\(HR_{adj}\) 2.03, 95%-CI 1.87 to 2.19; \(\it P\)<0.001), sepsis (\(HR_{adj}\) 1.73, 95%-CI 1.71 to 1.76; \(\it P\)<0.001), and also in survivors of severe infections without organ dysfunction (\(HR_{adj}\) 1.70, 95%-CI 1.65 to 1.74; \(\it P\)<0.001) compared to matched controls without infectious diseases. Strikingly, patients treated in rehabilitation facilities showed a significantly improved 5-year survival after suffering from sepsis or septic shock (\(HR_{adj}\) 0.81, 95%-CI 0.77 to 0.85; \(\it P\)<0.001) as well as severe infections without organ dysfunction (\(HR_{adj}\) 0.81, 95%-CI 0.73 to 0.90; \(\it P\)<0.001) compared to matched patients discharged to home or self-care. Long-term mortality and morbidity of hospital survivors are markedly increased after septic shock, sepsis and severe infections without organ dysfunction, but best 5-year survival was recorded in patients discharged to a rehabilitation facility in all three groups. Thus, our data suggest that specialized aftercare programs may help to improve long-term outcome in these patients and warrants more vigilance in future investigations.

Download full text files

Export metadata

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar
Metadaten
Author:Tim RahmelORCiDGND, Stefanie SchmitzGND, Hartmuth Sebastian Burkhard NowakORCiDGND, Kaspar SchepanekGND, Lars BergmannORCiDGND, Peter HalberstadtGND, Stefan HörterGND, Jürgen PetersGND, Michael AdamzikORCiDGND
URN:urn:nbn:de:hbz:294-76788
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228952
Parent Title (English):PLoS ONE
Subtitle (English):the importance of aftercare
Publisher:Public Library of Science
Place of publication:San Francisco
Document Type:Article
Language:English
Date of Publication (online):2020/11/27
Date of first Publication:2020/02/12
Publishing Institution:Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Universitätsbibliothek
Tag:Open Access Fonds
Volume:15
Issue:2, Article e0228952
First Page:e0228952-1
Last Page:e0228952-15
Note:
Article Processing Charge funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) and the Open Access Publication Fund of Ruhr-Universität Bochum.
Institutes/Facilities:Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin und Schmerztherapie
open_access (DINI-Set):open_access
Licence (English):License LogoCreative Commons - CC BY 4.0 - Attribution 4.0 International