Transient stent placement versus tubeless procedure after ureteroscopy retrograde surgery stone extraction (Fast Track Stent study 2)

  • \(\bf Objectives\) To determine whether in pre-stented patients undergoing ureteroscopic stone removal (ureteroscopy retrograde surgery) a tubeless procedure provides a better outcome compared with short-term (6 h) ureteral stenting using an external ureteral catheter. \(\bf Methods\) In this single academic center study (Fast Track Stent study 2), carried out between May 2016 and April 2018, 121 patients with renal or ureteral calculi were initially treated with double-J insertion. Before secondary ureteroscopy retrograde surgery, patients were prospectively randomized into two groups: tubeless versus ureteral catheter insertion for 6 h after ureteroscopy retrograde surgery. Exclusion criteria were acute urinary tract infection, solitary kidney or stone diameter >25 mm. Study end-points were stent-related symptoms assessed by a validated questionnaire (ureteral stent symptom questionnaire), administered both before and 4 weeks after surgery. Numerical ureteral stent symptom questionnaire scores were compared using the Mann–Whitney-U-test. The level of significance was defined as \(\it P\) < 0.05. \(\bf Results\) Ureteroscopy retrograde surgery procedures carried out by 13 surgeons resulted in >90% stone removal in all patients (\(\it n\) = 121), with a mean operation time of 19.9 versus 18.0 min for ureteral catheter versus tubeless, respectively (\(\it P\) = 0.37). Patient groups did not differ significantly in their ureteral stent symptom questionnaire scores (urinary index \(\it P\) = 0.24; pain index \(\it P\) = 0.35). Patients showed a significant preference for tubeless procedure over ureteral catheter reinsertion (Question GQ \(\it P\) < 0.0001). The reintervention rate was 13.3% for the tubeless procedure (\(\it n\) = 8) and 1.6% for the ureteral catheter group (\(\it n\) = 1), respectively (\(\it P\) = 0.034). \(\bf Conclusions\) Short-term ureteral catheter and no stent insertion after ureteroscopy retrograde surgery stone extraction in pre-stented patients result in comparable quality of life. However, the reintervention rate is higher for tubeless procedures.

Download full text files

Export metadata

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar
Metadaten
Author:Alina Marion ReicherzORCiDGND, Verena MaasGND, Patricia WenzelGND, Lisa DahlkampGND, Rein-Jüri PalisaarGND, Christian von BodmanGND, Joachim NoldusGND, Peter BachGND
URN:urn:nbn:de:hbz:294-98913
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.14291
Parent Title (English):International journal of urology
Subtitle (English):a randomized prospective evaluation
Publisher:Wiley
Place of publication:Hoboken, New Jersey
Document Type:Article
Language:English
Date of Publication (online):2023/05/17
Date of first Publication:2020/07/06
Publishing Institution:Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Universitätsbibliothek
Tag:double-J stent; flexible ureteroscopy; transient ureteral stenting; ureteroscopy; urolithiasis
Volume:27
Issue:9
First Page:749
Last Page:754
Note:
Dieser Beitrag ist auf Grund des DEAL-Wiley-Vertrages frei zugänglich.
Institutes/Facilities:Marienhospital Herne, Klinik für Urologie
Dewey Decimal Classification:Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften / Medizin, Gesundheit
open_access (DINI-Set):open_access
faculties:Medizinische Fakultät
Licence (English):License LogoCreative Commons - CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 - Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International